Peter Svensk

In Uncategorized on April 13, 2003 at 11:16 am

The Weekly Standard: Beyond Baghdad

On September 24, 2002, New York Times columnist Paul Krugman warned his readers about a “definite whiff of imperial ambition in the air.” The next month he was certain about the coming occupation of Iraq. “The administration has offered many different explanations, some of them mutually contradictory, for its determination to occupy Baghdad.”

Effective with the fall of Baghdad last week, Krugman inverted his critique, in the process establishing his own impeccable credentials when it comes to “mutually contradictory” arguments. “There is a pattern to the Bush administration’s way of doing business that does not bode well for the future–a pattern of conquest followed by malign neglect,” Krugman wrote April 11. “After the triumph,” he wrote of the Bush administration, “when it comes time to take care of what they’ve won, their attention wanders, and things go to pot.”

It’s hard to predict the future, but there’s no sign yet that the administration is suffering from attention deficit disorder. Indeed, postwar planning continues apace in Washington and Kuwait.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: